Back to Montclair
Montclair Elementary School Science Fair

TIPS FOR PRESENTING YOUR RESEARCH TO THE JUDGES

  • Practice presenting your research to others before you speak with the judges.  Ask your audience for feedback:  What things do you need to clarify?  Emphasize?  Highlight?
  • Be sure to communicate your enthusiasm for your work.  Let the judges know how interested you are in what you investigated.
  • Try to relax.  Speak to the judges like you would talk with your teacher at school.
  • Take a moment to think about the questions the judges pose.  Answer as thoroughly and as clearly as possible.
WHAT KINDS OF QUESTIONS CAN YOU ANTICIPATE?
Background Knowledge:
Why did you decide to investigate this topic?
What is the purpose of your project?
What resources did you find useful in investigating this topic?
Experimental Design:
What was your variable?
What variable did you intentionally change?
What response did you observe or measure?
What did you intentionally keep the same?
What groups did you compare the others against?  Why?
How many times did you repeat the experiment?
Materials and Methods:
What materials did you use?
What procedures did you follow in performing your experiment?
If a mentor assisted you, in what ways was he or she helpful?
Results and Conclusions:
What results did you find?
How did your findings relate to your original hypothesis?
What would you do differently next time?
What was the most important think you learned?
What additional experiments do you suggest?
What conclusions can you draw?
Who would be interested in your experiment?

PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA

BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE (0-9 points)
  • Key scientific concepts
  • Literature review
  • Evidence of procedural plan
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN (0-24 points)
  • Questions (objective)
  • Components
    • Hypothesis
    • Variables
      • Independent (IV)
      • Dependent (DV)
      • Constants
      • Control
    • Repeated Trials
  • Procedure (including materials)
RESULTS/CONCLUSION (0-21 points)
  • Choice of data display (table chart, graph, etc) is appropriate
  • Data displays reflect IV, DV, derived quantities, units
  • Data displays are titled and use appropriate scale
  • Discussion of data includes references to the data, a statement of how the data support or don't support the hypothesis
  • Major findings
  • Interpretations
  • Implications for further study
DISPLAY (0-9 points)
  • Attractive and ligible
  • Accurate
  • Consistent with science fair regulations
CLARITY:  INTERVIEW AND RESEARCH PAPER (0-12 points)
  • Communicates scientific basis
  • Describes design principles
  • Explains data
  • Recognizes limitations
CREATIVE ABILITY/ORIGINALITY (0-25 points)
  • Experimental design reflects novel approach to the problem posed
  • Analysis and interpretation of data demonstrates logical thinking
  • Design and use of equipment shows creative approaches