EVALUATION CRITERIA

Project Evaluation / Judging Criteria: Grades 5-8
Background Knowledge (0-10 points)
  • Depth of study (key concepts; literature review)
  • Information is presented clearly, logically
Experimental Design (0-25 points)
  • Depth of study (key concepts; literature review)
  • Information is presented clearly, logically
Results / Conclusion (0-30 points)
  • Results are presented with chart, table or graph (including scale, title, labels, correct units)
  • Results are directly related to the question and hypothesis(supports/does not support)
  • Lab notebook contains raw data and orderly recording of data
  • Thorough interpretation of data
  • Conclusion is logical and based on data collected
  • Conclusion includes questions for future research
Display (0-10 points)
  • All components are present
  • Evidence of correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling
Clarity (0-10 points)
  • Communicates scientific basis of research
  • Describes design principles, explains data analysis procedures, recognizes study limitations
Creative Ability / Originality (0-15 points)
  • Shows creativity and originality in question posed
  • Innovative approach to solving the problem and using equipment
  • Study was within the student’s ability range; excessive help not utilized



Project Evaluation & Judging Criteria: Grades 9-12
Background Knowledge (0-9 points)
  • Key scientific concepts
  • Literature review
  • Evidence of procedural plan
Experimental Design (0-24 points)
Components
Hypothesis Testable relationship between variables
Independent Variable (IV) Factor purposefully changed
Dependent Variable (DV) Factor that responds
Constants Factors kept the same
Control Used as a standard comparison
Repeated Trials Number of subjects or times repeated
Clearly stated objective
Clear and precise procedure
Results / Conclusion (0-21 points)
  • Choice of data display (table, chart, graph, etc.) is appropriate
  • Data displays reflect IV, DV, derived quantities, units
  • Data displays are titled and use appropriate scale
  • Discussion of data includes references to the data, a statement of how the data support or don’t support the hypothesis
  • Major findings are stated
  • Thorough interpretations of data are made
  • Implications for further study; significant, practical applications are identified
Display (0-9 points)
  • Accurate and complete
  • Attractive and legible; correct grammar and spelling
  • Consistent with science fair regulations
Clarity: Interview and Research Paper (0-12 points)
  • Communicates scientific basis
  • Describes design principles
  • Explains data
  • Recognizes limitations
Creative Ability / Originality (0-25 points)
  • Research design reflects novel approach to the problem posed
  • Analysis and interpretation of data demonstrates logical thinking
  • Design and use of equipment shows creative approaches

Note: Project judging and evaluation criteria for team projects at Grades 9-12 vary. Refer to the 2007 International Rules & Guidelines for Intel ISEF for more information.





SCIENCE FAIR JUDGING CRITERIA

Background Knowledge and Plan

Experimental Design / Procedures

Results / Conclusions

Display

Clarity

Creative Ability / Originality



JUDGING HINTS

Suggested Questions for the Judges