Project Evaluation / Judging Criteria: Grades 5-8
| (0-10 points) |
- Depth of study (key concepts; literature review)
- Information is presented clearly, logically
|
| (0-25 points) |
- Depth of study (key concepts; literature review)
- Information is presented clearly, logically
|
| (0-30 points) |
- Results are presented with chart, table or graph (including scale, title, labels, correct units)
- Results are directly related to the question and hypothesis(supports/does not support)
- Lab notebook contains raw data and orderly recording of data
- Thorough interpretation of data
- Conclusion is logical and based on data collected
- Conclusion includes questions for future research
|
| (0-10 points) |
- All components are present
- Evidence of correct grammar, sentence structure, spelling
|
| (0-10 points) |
- Communicates scientific basis of research
- Describes design principles, explains data analysis procedures, recognizes study limitations
|
| (0-15 points) |
- Shows creativity and originality in question posed
- Innovative approach to solving the problem and using equipment
- Study was within the student’s ability range; excessive help not utilized
|
Project Evaluation & Judging Criteria: Grades 9-12
| (0-9 points) |
- Key scientific concepts
- Literature review
- Evidence of procedural plan
|
| (0-24 points) |
| Components |
| Hypothesis |
Testable relationship between variables |
| Independent Variable (IV) |
Factor purposefully changed |
| Dependent Variable (DV) |
Factor that responds |
| Constants |
Factors kept the same |
| Control |
Used as a standard comparison |
| Repeated Trials |
Number of subjects or times repeated |
| Clearly stated objective |
| Clear and precise procedure |
|
| (0-21 points) |
- Choice of data display (table, chart, graph, etc.) is appropriate
- Data displays reflect IV, DV, derived quantities, units
- Data displays are titled and use appropriate scale
- Discussion of data includes references to the data, a statement of how the data
support or don’t support the hypothesis
- Major findings are stated
- Thorough interpretations of data are made
- Implications for further study; significant, practical applications are identified
|
| (0-9 points) |
- Accurate and complete
- Attractive and legible; correct grammar and spelling
- Consistent with science fair regulations
|
| (0-12 points) |
- Communicates scientific basis
- Describes design principles
- Explains data
- Recognizes limitations
|
| (0-25 points) |
- Research design reflects novel approach to the problem posed
- Analysis and interpretation of data demonstrates logical thinking
- Design and use of equipment shows creative approaches
|
Note: Project judging and evaluation criteria for team projects at Grades 9-12 vary.
Refer to the 2007 International Rules & Guidelines for Intel ISEF for more information.